Light Rain Fog/Mist, 50.0°
Log in ·
Posted 25 April 2018, 7:47 a.m.
Interesting Harlan. You can't counter my argument, so you chose to attack me personally. I believe that's called ad hominem, isn't it? (Just like #45)
And yes, we are quite a pair. Thank you.
Posted 24 April 2018, 11:34 a.m.
Unfortunately this was well played. The jail expansion and mental health treatment expansion should not have been combined into the same referendum. How do I vote if I'm for one, but not the other? Well played indeed.
We need the additional mental health treatment capabilities. That, in and of itself will decrease the jail population, which will in turn put off the need for a jail expansion.
The tax increase wouldn't be so bad if the State would cut grocery sales taxes. However, that would require a state constitutional amendment; essentially an impossibility.
BLUF. I am voting YES on the referendum, if for no other reason than the AFP is pushing for a no vote.
Posted 24 April 2018, 8:55 a.m.
Oh great. Now we're probably going to have a misogynistic, bigoted, anti-choice, supremacist for Sec of State. Don't forget, Pompeo couldn't get re-elected in his home district in KS, so #45 took that as a mark of distinction and pulled Pompeo into his administration.
Posted 24 April 2018, 8:35 a.m.
Another example of the "Oppressed Christians" going to court in an attempt to make sure everyone else is bound by their fictitious canon law. They would rather place a child (or children) with a family of abusers that with a loving same-sex family. Needs and interests of the child be damned; if you're not the right kind of Christian (to start with), then don't even talk to us.
Also, the "Catholic Charities of Southwest Kansas" should remove the would "Charities" from their title as they're not in any way charitable. A question for them, would they allow a child to be placed with a Catholic family in which one or both parents had been divorced and remarried?
Posted 20 March 2018, 1:41 p.m.
Outstanding!Looking forwards to attending.
Posted 8 March 2018, 11:34 a.m.
Since when is the League of Women Voters an activist organization? Are they one because they oppose KKK Kobach's voter suppression efforts? If so, they I support them 100%.
Posted 8 March 2018, 8:37 a.m.
Kobach has one simple goal, to deny people the right to vote; and he will go to any lengths to reach that goal.
IMHO, if he could, KKK Kobach would reinstate the following and more:<ul><li>a literacy test at both the polls and when registering<li>a poll tax<li>documentation requirements so onerous that it's impossible to register to vote</ul>
*****@Bob Summers. You never have anything to add that's germane to any discussion. You and others like you do little more than to poison the waters here. Quit being such a POS or go sit at the children's table until the adults are done with the discussion.*****@Charles Bloss. Why are you with Kobach other than simply because he's a hard right Republican?
Posted 6 March 2018, 1:52 p.m.
Jillian, You're being too kind.
Posted 6 March 2018, 12:42 p.m.
We were sold the state lottery on the promise that the profits would go to education.
Maybe it's time The Guv mark 2 caused that to happen.
Posted 12 February 2018, 2:51 p.m.
Full LJWorld.com site
© 2018 LJWorld.com