Log in ·
Wow....just wow (smacks palm against forehead)
Posted 18 May 2018, 5:22 p.m.
He's my "favorite" son
Posted 18 May 2018, 2:31 p.m.
So if a ban of "assault" rifles reduced the school shooting by 10%, would the gun-grabbers then call for a ban on shotguns if that would reduce shootings another 5%? What is your acceptable level of reduction? 10%, 20%..... How far down the chain are you willing to go with gun banning to reach your definition of acceptable level? We all know that a 100% reduction is impossible.
Posted 18 May 2018, 12:37 p.m.
Reports are the shooter used a shotgun. I guess the call to ban assault weapons isn't the panacea the gun-grabbers purport it to be.
Posted 18 May 2018, 11:42 a.m.
correction "than they needed?"
Posted 10 May 2018, 10:22 a.m.
Does anyone know of a study where a taxpayer supported entity found that they had more resources that they needed? Anyone?
Posted 10 May 2018, 7:26 a.m.
Sorry Ken but if the Legislature passes a constitutional amendment it is by definition, constitutional. Now whether such an amendment would be the wise thing to do is another matter altogether.
Posted 9 May 2018, 12:39 p.m.
All you need do is amend the Constitution. Get to it.
Of course if you succeed, there will be no need to those in fly over country to bother voting. All national elections will be decided by results from California, Texas, Florida, New York and Illinois. It's called tyranny of the majority....look it up.
Posted 4 May 2018, 1:13 p.m.
What's the matter Bobbie? I touch a nerve snowflake?
Posted 24 April 2018, 3:06 p.m.
In other words, you have no idea but that doesn't stop you from throwing accusations around.
Posted 24 April 2018, 12:47 p.m.
Full LJWorld.com site
© 2018 LJWorld.com