cloudyPartly Cloudy, 47.0°

Andrew Applegarth

Comment history

Adeas (Andrew Applegarth) says...

"Where did they get this doctor......From Central Casting ?"

Actually, he was appointed by Obama as Physician to the President in 2013 and merely retained by Trump. Would you like to change your rant now, or would you like to tell us how incompetent Obama was in picking this physician?

Adeas (Andrew Applegarth) says...

It wasn't in the 5:51 PM update. It looks like they did a massive rewrite of the article for the 9:17 PM update.

Adeas (Andrew Applegarth) says...

Read the article. There are several reasons listed.

Adeas (Andrew Applegarth) says...

From reading the article and looking at the pictures, I believe the mural is painted on steel plates that are mounted on the concrete walls rather than having been painted directly onto the concrete walls.

Adeas (Andrew Applegarth) says...

How about if you compare it to something relevant, such voting? Procreation? Free speech (even when you're trying to mislead people with unrelated comparisons)?

Add them together and you still have 0 days...

Adeas (Andrew Applegarth) says...

When you say "Jayhawkers weren't stealing property, they were stealing humans so they could get them to freedom" you simply confirm that you don't know what you are talking about.

Regarding the first part, read the real history and you'll find that they were thieves and murderers just like all of the other guerilla groups on both sides of the conflict. Their primary activities were killing, looting, and burning. It wasn't the cause that brought many of these people to join these groups, it was the handy 'justification' for the actions they got to commit.

As to the second part, they weren't riding into towns and freeing slaves. They were riding into towns, killing as many townsfolk as they could, stealing as much as they could, and often burning as much that was left behind as possible. To be brutally honest (and history reflects this if you really look), the only difference between Jayhawkers and Quantrill's Raiders was which side they claimed allegiance to in order to justify their criminal acts. That's the only difference, despite delusional folks like you trying to whitewash history to make yourselves feel better about raising a bunch of murderous thieves as heroes.

Adeas (Andrew Applegarth) says...

Enough with the anti-NRA propaganda. There is no notion that owning a firearm makes you safe. To be honest, there really is no such thing as being safe (except maybe in baseball). However, there is a fact that having a firearm can give you more options and make you safer.

If you believe the notion that nobody legally owning a firearm will make you safe (or even safer), I have some ocean front property on the edge of town I would love to sell you...

On Letter to the editor: Guns among us

Posted 23 November 2017, 10:28 a.m. Suggest removal

Adeas (Andrew Applegarth) says...

Because bump stocks are not actually the issue. Banning them is just a low hanging fruit that gun control advocates think they can achieve.

Despite your recollection, it was not bump stocks that made the shooting possible and there is credible evidence that the carnage could have been much greater with a focus on aiming instead of rapid fire.

On Letter to the editor: Guns among us

Posted 23 November 2017, 10:24 a.m. Suggest removal

Adeas (Andrew Applegarth) says...

Pointing out the truth is not an attack. I'm sorry that you are such a corrupt individual that the light of truth burns you.

The contempt I have for you has been well-earned and unique to you despite all of the people I have argued and disagreed with. I suggest again that you go find a mirror and have a talk with the person who earned such contempt rather than continuing to bother me. leave me alone!

On Letter to the editor: Guns among us

Posted 23 November 2017, 10:08 a.m. Suggest removal

Adeas (Andrew Applegarth) says...

I never said it was an attack on me. Thanks for displaying yet again that you are too dishonest to address what I actually said and find it necessary to distort it instead. I simply asked if I should go ahead and point out the bits you skipped over to make your reply sound like a true rebuttal or if I should wait until you "clarified" your position. I used quotes because what you call clarifying has always been saying something completely different when you get called out for a previous comment. Don't pretend this is something new, as you have demonstrated this behavior in pretty much every discussion we've ever engaged in and I have called you on it multiple times. To act like it was a new surprise is just another instance of you being deceitful, so I guess I should expect no less from you...

I tire of your continued lack of integrity and say again, take your forked tongue elsewhere and leave me alone!

On Letter to the editor: Guns among us

Posted 22 November 2017, 10:22 p.m. Suggest removal

Full LJWorld.com site