overcastOvercast and Breezy, 71.0°

Lawrence school board directs staff to start planning August 2019 introduction of later high school start times

Lawrence High School, left, and Free State High School are pictured on Friday, Nov. 6, 2015.

The Lawrence school board agreed Monday to begin planning for Lawrence and Free State high school students to sleep in another 25 minutes, starting in August 2019.

At the conclusion of a work session Monday, the board directed staff to begin planning to start high school classes at 8:30 a.m. with the start of the 2019-2020 school year. The first high school “zero hour” classes now start at 8:05 a.m.

With the decision, the board agreed to an implementation schedule that will have staff schedule in March, April and May a first round of informational and listening forums with students, parents and staff. During those same months, district officials will meet with district bus contractor First Student about the need for more buses, routes and drivers when the high school start and dismissal times differ from those of elementary and middle schools. District officials also will develop the cost of those additions. It is now estimated the later high school start and dismissal times will add $100,000 per year to district transportation costs.

Board member Rick Ingram has long called for later start times, citing research that indicates it improves academic performance, attendance and graduation rates while reducing tardiness, teen vehicle accident rates and sports injuries. At Monday’s work session, he said later start times was an equity issue because research shows minority students tend to get less sleep and the sleep they do get is of less quality.

“I would like to see 9:30 or 10 in the morning,” he said. “There is data from the American Academy of Pediatrics those later start times have a bigger impact, but we thought 8:30 was doable.”

In August, Ingram was unsuccessful in getting the start-time change listed among this year’s board goals. The board did agree, however, to include questions on the issue on a community phone survey and on a November online survey aimed at district parents and staff. The phone survey showed 78 percent of responders favored the board continue to study later morning start times or make them a priority. Online survey results showed 69 percent of parents and 63 percent of staff supported making later start times a board priority or subject of further study.

Those survey results swayed Ingram’s fellow board members to support a 25-minute delay in high school morning starts, but not to join his call to introduce the change at the start of the 2018-2019 school year. That was too constricted a schedule to do proper planning or get feedback from parents, students and staff on the consequences of later start and dismissal times, the majority of the board agreed. Concerns identified by board members include conflicts with parent work schedules, high school students who provide after-school daycare for younger siblings, students losing more class time to afternoon athletic events and the effect on student employment.

“I would rather we take the time to do this right and take deliberate steps,” Board President Shannon Kimball said.

Comments

Zoe Flowers

The high schools already have one late start day once a week. Are there less students tardy or absent on those days? Are they more alert in class those days. The numbers are there, has anyone looked. What impact will this have on elementary students that will be walking to and from school at the same time? As it is now, teenage drivers are usually already in class by the time the younger kids start walking to school. I am not against the late start but have experienced first hand the problems teenage drivers cause when school starts later. By the way, a lot of them do not stop for crossing guards or pedestrians.

3 months, 3 weeks ago

Report

Nancy Hamilton

Bus schedule remains the same on late start days. So, absences are unlikely to be different. I hear you about student drivers
. But, it should be of some comfort to know that the data show that later start times actually reduces traffic accidents. Drowsy driving is about as dangerous as drunk driving.

3 months, 3 weeks ago

Report

Carl Ellerd

All this means is the students will stay up later and still whine about start time being too early.

3 months, 3 weeks ago

Report

Bob Summers

I think noon would be a better start time for the emotionally delicate children.

Are there any thoughts on paying students to go to school?

Maybe minimum wage would be appropriate to allow them to purchase crucial items they need?

3 months, 3 weeks ago

Report

Douglas Thompson

I would rather they be concerned that my second grader gets picked up by the bus at 6:45 in the morning. If teenagers can't get to school before 8:30, why is my 7 year old having to get up at 6:15?

3 months, 3 weeks ago

Report

Brandon Devlin

What a bunch of curmudgeons you all are. Get a life.

3 months, 3 weeks ago

Report

Greg DiVilbiss

There are plenty of studies that show later start times for students benefit the students. Rick Ingram is correct a 9:30 or 10am start time would be better for the students.

It is science people.

3 months, 3 weeks ago

Report

Full LJWorld.com site