sunnyFair, 72.0°

Kansas City company that offered boy higher wage than girl sanctioned

— Two teenagers whose firing from a Kansas pizza restaurant prompted a national discussion on pay inequality should receive back pay and the corporation that owned the restaurant must implement policies to ensure it follows equal pay laws, a federal judge ruled Thursday.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued last year on behalf of Jensen Walcott and Jake Reed, who were 17 when they applied to work at a Pizza Studio restaurant in Kansas City, Kan. The Bonner Springs friends were hired for the same job but Jensen later discovered Reed was going to be paid 25 cents more per hour. When she complained, the manager said it was against company policy to discuss wages and withdrew the job offers.

The controversy drew the attention of Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign, and Reed and Walcott were invited to address the Democratic National Convention about pay inequality.

The pizza chain later dismissed the female manager and offered the teens their jobs back, with equal pay, but they had found other jobs.

A federal judge on Thursday ordered PS Holding LLC to pay Reed and Walcott $2,500 each in back pay and other compensation. The judge also ordered the Delaware-based company to implement new policies and conduct training to avoid violating the federal Equal Pay Act. The company also must collect, analyze and report data and complaints to the EEOC. PS Holding no longer owns the Kansas City restaurant but owns other Pizza Studio restaurants across the country.

A phone call to the Pizza Studio’s corporate headquarters was not immediately returned Thursday.

The Equal Pay Act makes it illegal to pay men and women unequally for the same job, and prohibits retaliation against an employee who complains.

Comments

Shane Powers

Wait, so they're both getting $2,500 in back pay? Seems the right thing would be for the young lady to be reimbursed the $.25 an hour as well...or the young man should have $.25 an hour deducted from his settlement. In any case, real rectification of the complaint should involve her getting a higher settlement amount than him.

1 week ago

Report

Bob Smith

So you're saying the guy should be punished for what the female hiring managed did? How punitive of you.

1 week ago

Report

Shane Powers

No. I'm saying the young lady was actually shorted during her employment at the restaurant, and the settlements should reflect that. Both young people were damaged in being dismissed from their jobs, but the young lady was damaged on an ongoing basis by not receiving proper pay. The sex of the hiring manager is irrelevant.

4 days, 5 hours ago

Report

Dorothy Hoyt-Reed

I am so proud of these 2 kids for standing up for what's right. Companies who hide what they pay their workers need to be stopped. Don't work for a company that (that, not who, companies are not people) doesn't allow you to talk about your wages.

1 week ago

Report

Full LJWorld.com site